VanPac News History

Copyright 1990 The San Diego Union-Tribune  
The San Diego Union-Tribune

 View Related Topics 

November 1, 1990, Thursday

SECTION: NEWS; Ed. 1,2,3,4,5; Pg. A-19

LENGTH: 308 words

HEADLINE: '72 pipe Bomb connected to recent deaths



Federal agents say they have e found similarities between a pipe Bomb used by a Georgia man in 1972 and bombs that killed a federal judge and an attorney last year.

The bombs' construction was unlike that of any of 10,000 bombs that federal agents have dissected, Agent Frank Lee of the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms said in an affidavit made public yesterday.

Similarities included the use of "square end plates with threaded rods extending from plate to plate within the pipe and secured with nuts," the February search warrant affidavit said.

That construction "is unique to the explosive device" Walter Leroy Moody Jr. was convicted of having in 1972 and three of four mail bombs sent in December 1989, Lee said.

He said he based the conclusion on a computer search of ATF and FBI records describing more than 10,000 bombs nationwide since 1975.

One of the December bombs killed Judge Robert Vance of the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta. Another killed Savannah lawyer Robert Robinson. Two other bombs were safely intercepted at the 11th Circuit offices and at the Jacksonville, Fla., office of the NAACP.

Moody, 56, of Rex, Ga., is a suspect in the slayings but has not been charged. He's being held without bail on unrelated charges.

Moody and his wife, Susan, 27, are charged with obstruction of justice, bribery and witness tampering for allegedly trying to erase his 1972 conviction for possessing the pipe Bomb that injured his ex-wife, Hazel.

The Moodys have requested separate trials. Walter Moody's trial is set for Nov. 27.

U.S. District Judge Anthony Alaimo on Monday granted the Moodys' request to move the trials outside the 11th District, from Macon to Brunswick. The ruling was made public in a written order yesterday.

Alaimo gave no reason for moving the trial.